1.  

    sciencey goodness But we both know that's not quite queue 

  2.  86470

     

    cybergay:

    I THROW A GIANT BUCKET OF AMINO ACIDS IN YOUR FACE AND YOU BRACE YOURSELF BECAUSE YOU’RE STUPID AND PROBABLY THOUGHT IT WOULD MELT YOUR FACE OFF BUT AMINO ACIDS ARE ACTUALLY HEALTHY VITAMINS AND I HAVE DECIEVED YOU

     

    sciencey goodness 

  3.  10240

     

    lucindasaxon:

    whompingwilllow:

    I hate telling noble gas jokes there’s never a reaction

    I love telling people neutron jokes at no charge

    (via smauglings)

     

    WOOP WOOP sciencey goodness 

  4.  53240

     
    tuckthis:

ghendel:

You think it’s like this, but it’s really like this.
rleon392:

The Sun and Inner Planets Moving Through Space


gasp.jpeg
this changes everything

    tuckthis:

    ghendel:

    You think it’s like this, but it’s really like this.

    rleon392:

    The Sun and Inner Planets Moving Through Space

    gasp.jpeg

    this changes everything

    (Source: cyberneticstarchild, via noottersontheflightdeck)

     

    sciencey goodness 

  5.  34941

     
     

    I don't know what this is but accurate school gases fill the volume of the container OHMYGOD sciencey goodness 

  6.  178

     

    realcleverscience:

    Adam Savage, “How Simple Ideas Lead to Scientific Discoveries”

    Great little talk by famous myth-buster Adam Savage. He focuses on three examples: feynman’s childhood inspiration from observing a ball in a wagon, the discovery of the circumference of the earth, and Fizeau’s ingenious device for measuring the speed of light.

    The talk has some great graphics and I really enjoyed his discussion about Fizeau’s experiment.

    check it out!

    (Source: ted.com)

     

    Adam savage mythbusters sciencey goodness i'm inspired! 

  7.  25256

     

    shipsandsails:

    what do you say when oxygen, hydrogen, sulfur, sodium and phosphorous walk into a bar

    OH SNaP

    (Source: binkshapiro)

     

    oh snap sciencey goodness 

  8.  1972

     

    (Source: azureusblue)

     

    erwin schrodinger ehehe cute sciencey goodness 

  9.  70160

     
    acciomydivision:

Holy shit scientists have made the Silence possible.

    acciomydivision:

    Holy shit scientists have made the Silence possible.

    (Source: halgae, via acciomydivision-deactivated2012)

     

    silence what silence wat sciencey goodness 

  10. ravenmgee:

    sherlocked-inside-the-tardis:

    shurlawk:

    scarfu:

    noviceartist:

    laurenocuma:

    brivonnet:

    What happens when a tree branch falls onto a powerline?

    Answer: Dramatic Annihilation

    Only 17 seconds long - stick to the end.

    Submitted by:  nonniebyrd

    THAT IS BEAUTIFUL.

    Did that shit…just explode rainbows?!

    iahenkjiakhbfkjwe

    idk why but I burst out laughing every time I see this video

    gapes at screen with open mouth

    “No,” the wire whispered. “You can’t—you’ll burn—”

    The branch smiled sadly, looking up at the tree that had protected her for so many years. But, the branch needed to know for herself the heat and passion of the wires. “I would rather burn a hundred times over,” she said softly, “than live an eternity away from you.”

    “But, I’m right here! You can see me every day!” The wire pleaded desperately. “You don’t have to do this!”

    “Actually, I do,” the branch replied. “I’m falling and it’s only a matter of time. Please…tell me you’ll catch me. Even if I’ll burn, tell me you’ll catch me.”

    The wire was silent before swaying in affirmation, gazing up at the branch that had always been so far above him. Always out of reach, always kept away, protected jealously by the tree.

    The wind was picking up, and with each blow, the branch swung ever closer to the wires until finally, she was ripped from the tree and fell down into the waiting arms of her beloved.

    “Hello,” she whispered, feeling that dreadful heat creeping up from her base. It wouldn’t be long now. The sparks were already starting and she was starting to glow. The wire tried to prevent the inevitable, desperately trying to contain the power he knew would lead to her violent destruction, but all he could do was watch her burn as they swayed in the wind.

    It was over within a few seconds. There was a sudden burst of colorful flames and everything was still. Even the wind had died down, leaving the remnants of the branch…his branch…sprawled across him, nothing more than a charred memory.

    You know Shweta’s going to great lengths not to do her paper when she writes a tragic OTP for a telephone wire and a tree branch.

    I’m going to now creep out as discreetly as possible and try to write my paper. Or something.

    Tumblr…did you just give me a fanfiction…about a stick falling on a power line?

    And people wonder why I spend so much time with you.

    (Source: wimp.com, via so-so-justice-blog)

     

    sciencey goodness sticks on the wire fire 

  11.  8188

     
     

    sciencey goodness glass art microbiology this is amazing! 

  12.  12575

     
    fuckyeahmolecularbiology:

8 Myths About Scientists
I stumbled across this in Thick Books and Thin Films by Adam Ruben. Pretty good.
Myth #1: Scientists frequently make “breakthroughs.”
Truth: Scientific discovery is agonizingly slow. The only time I’ve ever run naked through the streets yelling “Eureka!” is when I forgot to refill my prescription.
Myth #2: Scientists work in isolation.
Truth: Scientists are even prouder of setting up collaborations than they are of actual results. Most scientific talks end with a slide listing all collaborators like little badges of honor—and the less similar the collaborator’s field, the prouder the scientist. “Well, you know, I might have discovered a cure for tuberculosis,” a scientist will say, “but what I’m really excited about is this new collaboration with an Icelandic poet!”
Myth #3: Scientists possess useful skills.
Truth: Scientists possess useful laboratory skills. But you should never allow a physicist to wire your house.
Myth #4: Scientists follow the scientific method as it was taught in high school: Observation, Question, Research, Hypothesis, Experiment, Conclusion.
Truth: In reality, the way scientists work is more like: Fiddle Around, Find Something Weird, Retest It, It Doesn’t Happen a Second Time, Get Distracted Trying to Make It Happen Again, Go to Chipotle, Recall the Original Purpose of Your Research, Start Over, Apply for Funding for a Better Instrument, Publish Some Interim Fluff, Learn That Someone Has Scooped You, Take Your Lab in a New Direction, Apply for Funding for the New Direction, Collaborate With an Icelandic Poet, Eat Chipotle With an Icelandic Poet, Co-Write Scientifically Accurate Ode to Walrus, Get Interested in Something Unrelated, Apply for Funding for Something Unrelated, Notice That 20 Years Have Passed.
Myth #5: Experiments always yield data that teach or reveal something.
Truth: Let’s say you’re doing an experiment with five mice. These particular mice will turn either yellow or blue. So you walk into the lab expecting to see five yellow mice, which will point to one explanation, or five blue mice, which will point to the other. Instead you would see one yellow mouse, one green mouse, one striped mouse, one plaid mouse (dead), and one mouse that has somehow sewn himself a little blue jacket, though he doesn’t wear it all the time.
Myth #6: A personal tragedy can turn a scientist evil.
Truth: Very few scientists are legitimately evil, though the number rises if you ask graduate students to characterize their advisers. Besides, it’s hard to be truly evil when you don’t have any practical skills.
Myth #7: A scientist can be proficient in all branches of science.
Truth: Exactly what discipline did the professor from Gilligan’s Island specialize in? Chemistry? Mechanical engineering? Coconut-based transistor radio construction? Any time a problem needed solving or a device needed building, the professor knew exactly how to do it. That guy could make anything. Except a boat.
People who don’t understand science assume that scientists can master any subfield. That’s why we’re often asked for our opinions about scientific news items, and we can only reply, “Uh … sorry … I know I’m a molecular phylogeneticist, and this story was about molecular phylogenetics, but, well, I’m a different kind of molecular phylogeneticist.”
Myth #8: Scientists are not sexy beasts.
Truth: Scientists are indeed sexy beasts. Not only do our lab coats make us look dapper and charming, those same coats look even better strewn unceremoniously over a standing lamp while we make passionate love to you.

    fuckyeahmolecularbiology:

    8 Myths About Scientists

    I stumbled across this in Thick Books and Thin Films by Adam Ruben. Pretty good.

    Myth #1: Scientists frequently make “breakthroughs.”

    Truth: Scientific discovery is agonizingly slow. The only time I’ve ever run naked through the streets yelling “Eureka!” is when I forgot to refill my prescription.

    Myth #2: Scientists work in isolation.

    Truth: Scientists are even prouder of setting up collaborations than they are of actual results. Most scientific talks end with a slide listing all collaborators like little badges of honor—and the less similar the collaborator’s field, the prouder the scientist. “Well, you know, I might have discovered a cure for tuberculosis,” a scientist will say, “but what I’m really excited about is this new collaboration with an Icelandic poet!”

    Myth #3: Scientists possess useful skills.

    Truth: Scientists possess useful laboratory skills. But you should never allow a physicist to wire your house.

    Myth #4: Scientists follow the scientific method as it was taught in high school: Observation, Question, Research, Hypothesis, Experiment, Conclusion.

    Truth: In reality, the way scientists work is more like: Fiddle Around, Find Something Weird, Retest It, It Doesn’t Happen a Second Time, Get Distracted Trying to Make It Happen Again, Go to Chipotle, Recall the Original Purpose of Your Research, Start Over, Apply for Funding for a Better Instrument, Publish Some Interim Fluff, Learn That Someone Has Scooped You, Take Your Lab in a New Direction, Apply for Funding for the New Direction, Collaborate With an Icelandic Poet, Eat Chipotle With an Icelandic Poet, Co-Write Scientifically Accurate Ode to Walrus, Get Interested in Something Unrelated, Apply for Funding for Something Unrelated, Notice That 20 Years Have Passed.

    Myth #5: Experiments always yield data that teach or reveal something.

    Truth: Let’s say you’re doing an experiment with five mice. These particular mice will turn either yellow or blue. So you walk into the lab expecting to see five yellow mice, which will point to one explanation, or five blue mice, which will point to the other. Instead you would see one yellow mouse, one green mouse, one striped mouse, one plaid mouse (dead), and one mouse that has somehow sewn himself a little blue jacket, though he doesn’t wear it all the time.

    Myth #6: A personal tragedy can turn a scientist evil.

    Truth: Very few scientists are legitimately evil, though the number rises if you ask graduate students to characterize their advisers. Besides, it’s hard to be truly evil when you don’t have any practical skills.

    Myth #7: A scientist can be proficient in all branches of science.

    Truth: Exactly what discipline did the professor from Gilligan’s Island specialize in? Chemistry? Mechanical engineering? Coconut-based transistor radio construction? Any time a problem needed solving or a device needed building, the professor knew exactly how to do it. That guy could make anything. Except a boat.

    People who don’t understand science assume that scientists can master any subfield. That’s why we’re often asked for our opinions about scientific news items, and we can only reply, “Uh … sorry … I know I’m a molecular phylogeneticist, and this story was about molecular phylogenetics, but, well, I’m a different kind of molecular phylogeneticist.”

    Myth #8: Scientists are not sexy beasts.

    Truth: Scientists are indeed sexy beasts. Not only do our lab coats make us look dapper and charming, those same coats look even better strewn unceremoniously over a standing lamp while we make passionate love to you.

    (Source: approachingsignificance, via sequoiawintersnight)

     

    scientists myths science myths sciencey goodness 

  13. j-m-hippiehouse:

liamdryden:

eligoesrawr:

No matter how long the slinky is, the bottom of the slinky will stay still (hover) until the top reaches it. Even if the slinky is over 1000 feet long.

woah

    j-m-hippiehouse:

    liamdryden:

    eligoesrawr:

    No matter how long the slinky is, the bottom of the slinky will stay still (hover) until the top reaches it. Even if the slinky is over 1000 feet long.

    woah

    (via theblueboxonbakerstreet)

     

    slinky sciencey goodness awesome!